GMO-Vaccines Making Siblings of Millions of Children, Teens and College Students: Who Can They Safely Have Children With In The Future?
All the vaccines for kids are GMO. The instability that Jeffrey Smith lists for agricultural GMOs all apply to the vaccines.
1. GMO vaccines genetically engineer - alter the DNA of - anyone receiving them, using the very same method used to genetically engineer seeds. Children are being genetically engineered. See: http://salem-news.com/articles/july172011/murdoch-vaccines-wn.php
2. The GMO material is patented, just as with seeds. Who owns children's blood, organs, bones, etc. if they include patented IP? We know how Monsanto acts about ownership.
3. Did you agree to have patented corporate intellectual property inside your child? No? Then it's a contract or IP law violation because it wasn't disclosed to you.
4. The GMO material injected into your child added new DNA strains to your child's DNA - from insect, pigs, monkey, viruses, etc. For the first time in human history, a new parental line has been added to children's genetic heritage - mother's DNA, father's DNA, insect DNA. Did you agree to this rape of your child's DNA by strangers, by other species?
5. Did you agree to having your genetic heritage, 10s or 1000s of years in the making and unique - beyond priceless intellectual property - corrupted in this way? Were you informed and compensated by the biotech industry in a contract for them to insert their own DNA choices into your child's DNA, your family's genetic heritage?
6. Did the same GMO-DNA in one vaccine get that injected into other children as well? Into how many others? 1? 10? 100? 1000? 10,000? 100,000? A million? However many children who had the GMO DNA forced into them by injection, are now SIBLINGS (even if only 1/3 siblings (mother, father, corporate GMO-DNA) of your child by virtue of sharing one parental line. Were you informed this would be the consequence of the vaccine you had your child take? Then this is another contract violation since that disclosure might be a deal ender for anyone agreeing to this patented intellectual property being inserted into your child.
7. How are children when they are older supposed to find others they can safely have children with if millions of their own age cohort are now their siblings? All of these children have identical DNA that is alien to humanity and might reasonably be considered vulnerable, weak, abnormal, or problematic. Obviously, bringing such DNA together in an offspring produced by siblings, especially siblings with the same non-HUMAN genetic vulnerability, weakness, abnormality, or problem, might produce birth defects of many kinds, including defects unseen before in human history since insect, pig, monkey and viral DNA are not normal for human beings.
8. In California where mandated vaccines are close to be signed into law, one must also ask what exactly is being mandated? GMO viruses are tremendously unstable, mixing with each other, creating new viruses, becoming more virulent. If California mandates one vaccine but the next month it could have mutated, or created a new virus altogether, does the law cover anything in the syringe at all, no matter how different it is? This is another contractual and IP issue.
9. What is in the vaccines at the time of use? Because in addition to mutating GMO viruses, there is an FDA regulation that would allow the government to add anything into a vaccine and have it approved without testing. So the question becomes even more concerning: what exactly is being mandated?
People are fighting for labeling of food. Using the current vaccine situation mentioned in the link about the FDA as an example, imagine ingredients in food packages that say "cake mix," but at any time the ingredients can be changed and suddenly include lethal levels of mercury but without changing the label on the box. Imagine the added ingredient could change the cake mix from something that could be used to bake a cake, to a mix of ingredients that could be used as an explosive.
So again, what PRECISELY is being mandated when all of the vaccines are highly unstable and can be secretly changed and left untested?
From "With Baited Breath" http://www.dogsnaturallymagazine.com/rabies-bait-dangers/
"There are other dangers inherent in genetically modified vaccines that make rabies baits pretty dangerous stuff. Splicing rabies onto other viruses can carry many risks that we are just recently becoming aware of. In Arizona and other parts of the US, rabies is starting to jump species. For the first time, we are seeing rabies jump from bats to foxes to skunks with no bite required. .... Maybe somebody should figure that out before they go splicing that virus together with other viruses, creating one angry mutant virus. ....
"Dr. Terje Traavik PhD (Centre of Biosafety), has written extensively about how genetically engineered viruses are creating new hybrid viruses through recombination. He cautions that the characteristics of some of these new hybrid viruses are similar to both of the parent viruses but also include traits from neither. Dr. Traavik specifically expresses concern about the stability of genetically engineered viruses. He notes that cases of rabies infected humans could be due to a return to virulence of the genetically engineered rabies virus with the pox viruses.
"In addition to the danger of jumping species and return to virulence, there is another frightening way for these new viruses to spread: aerosolization. It used to be that we could feel pretty safe about rabies because the chances that our dogs would trade saliva with another animal were pretty slim. Nowadays, thanks to recombinant vaccines, there is no bite required. The Center for Disease Control acknowledges that rabies can be spread via aerosolization so you or your dog need only be in close proximity to a rabies infected animal to be in danger. [Emphasis added.]
10. All of these issues exist outside of vaccine court and can be dealt with by an army of lawyers now, on behalf of parents and children whose HUMAN genetic heritage has been corrupted by corporate IP because these are incontrovertible IP issues, contract issues.
Legislators across the country need to understand what they are doing.
11. The fact that the vaccines are also GMO brings together two powerful communities of people concerned about health, and it changes the entire landscape around vaccines. Contractually, no one agreed to have their or their children's DNA - their priceless IP - contaminated by corporate patented IP. That's a major contract issue that would entail extensive disclosure and vast compensation. And the fact of vaccines genetically engineering children (and they hope for adults, too) when combined with the world antipathy for agricultural GMOS, is a catalytic combination.
12. At a practical level, for schools, hospitals or any individuals attempting to force vaccine mandates on people, those who believe they are covered under "health" laws, may not be so comfortable if they can be sued under contract or IP laws.
Human DNA is being raped by corporate patented GMOs, creating a new parental line in the injected person of the raping entity. Okay, fine. This may open the door to lawyers lining up to sue anyone involved in forcing that, from day care centers to school teachers to health commissions, lobbyists.
And legislatures that attempt to block parents from testifying or states that attempt to remove exemptions are actually denying people their ability to engage in a contract, to have disclosure of contract details, to accept or refuse an offer, to counteroffer or to arrange compensation for what is being contracted around (How much would someone accept for the corporate wrecking of their unique genetic heritage - IP? A billion? A trillion?).
13. The health claims for vaccines are starting to look as bogus as "GMOs give bigger crop yields and are safe." Those lies are being exposed everywhere now. The same glowing claims are made for vaccine but the same industry is behind agricultural and vaccine GMOs. What is the base reality? 1) Vaccines are all GMOs. 2) Contract law and IP law are involved. 3) Kids in the millions are being genetically engineered by corporations doing the same to plants.
This time it's kids, not corn, who are being genetically engineered and with insect DNA.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/50488562/ns/health-cold_and_flu/ – .UucH0vYo5z8. (Two people died during the test but NBC doesn't mention it. http://www.projectcensored.org/fda-approves-first-gmo-vaccine/)
14. Vaccines are being pushed as safe and urgently needed under false "health" arguments EXACTLY as GMOs were pushed as safe under "save humanity" arguments using bogus crop data. The very same companies are producing the same safety and urgency lies.
Safe?
Gates' vaccine paralyzed almost 48,000 children in India in 2011 alone.
15. Do the vaccine bills have any fail-safe provision to inspect the vaccines and stop any in case a vaccine is "defective" or "lethal" or "contains a sterilizing agent" or contains microchips? This is all part of contracting. This is a business arrangement the people being offered the implied contract need to respond with their counter offer. Yes, we'll agree but we want billions for any vaccine given as the price for allowing our priceless IP to become corporate property.
16. Children's organic DNA is being contaminated with corporate patented IP using trickery just as organic fields have been contaminated by pollen drift or intentional spills. Both are about taking over people's' IP and about corporate ownership of nature's DNA, whether agricultural or human.
17. Jerk the vaccine issue away from health where all the legal rights have been removed. These are contract and IP issues that are incontrovertible.
SIGNATURE
Posted at 07:09 AM | Permalink
technorati tags post footer links
Reblog (0)
No comments:
Post a Comment